Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers
By: Erin Carrier-Barnhart
I am bothered by the Michigan laws regarding larceny. As a firm believer in the childhood rule of
“finder’s keepers, loser’s weepers,” it irks me that Michigan law does not agree
with this very basic concept, which makes total sense to
me.
For example, if a person accidentally leaves their cell
phone in the booth of a restaurant, and the next patron comes along and
discovers the cell phone, she has two legal options. She can either leave the cell phone there or
she can attempt to locate the rightful owner by either turning the phone in to
the restaurant or contacting the proper authorities. Either way, she may not keep the cell phone
for herself. If she does, she has
committed a larceny.
It’s true that one cannot steal property that has been
abandoned; however, the property must be truly abandoned for it to be up for
grabs. It’s extremely unlikely for
someone to abandon anything of value such as a cell phone or a piece of
jewelry. It’s even more unlikely that a
jury is going to believe that the property was truly abandoned, even if the
original owner cannot be located.
My thoughts on the issue are simple: If someone is reckless or absent-minded
enough to lose their property, it’s no one’s fault but their own. Loser’s weepers! If your property is so very special to you,
you should take better care of it and not leave it behind. Kudos to the lucky person who happens to come
along and discover that something of value is up for grabs! Finder’s keepers! Why should the person who happens to discover
the lost item and takes advantage of an opportunity that presents itself be
punished?
I am not arguing that people should not do the “right” thing
and try to locate the true owner of property that they discover has been
lost. Honestly, I hope that if someone
found something of mine that I had misplaced, that it would be turned in for me
to come back and claim. But if it isn’t,
well, I guess I should have taken better care of it to begin with. And to the lucky person who found the
property that I negligently left behind:
I hope you take better care of it than I did. That person is not committing a theft against
me; he or she is taking advantage of an opportunity that presented itself. In my opinion, a person who finds a lost
wallet and doesn’t turn it in should not be classified the same as someone who
steals a wallet from someone. Finding a
lost item and failing to turn it in is not the same thing as stealing an item
from someone who has taken the proper steps to maintain possession of the
item.
Regardless of my personal feelings on the matter, the
legislature has spoken. It is
a larceny if you find something and keep it for yourself, so be careful out
there. If you find a dollar in the
parking lot, you better turn it in at the customer service window, or leave it
where it lies, because as soon as you put it in your pocket to keep it for
yourself, you have committed a larceny.
No comments:
Post a Comment